Mary Radabaugh, manager of Central Marine Stuart, shares a summary of the marina's frequent fight with toxic algae-filled summers. Treasure Coast Newspapers
Protecting Naples’ Small Town Character
Ray Christman Naples City Council
About a year ago – in early 2019 – the City of Naples asked residents to respond to a survey as part of a new “visioning” process. This exercise had not been carried out in more than ten years. The survey asked questions about priority issues and concerns and how well they
were being addressed.
The responses yielded several important takeaways:
• First, nearly 2,000 Naples residents took the time to complete the 30-minute online questionnaire, a remarkable response rate. People showed they cared.
• Second, the responses confirmed that residents overwhelmingly wanted to protect Naples’ small town character as a first priority.
• And, third, the responses showed significant dissatisfaction with how the City was dealing with key issues that impacted our community like development, and the environment.
These results were no surprise to me based on my own recent civic experiences helping lead a citizens initiative for local government ethics reform, serving on the City’s Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board, and running last year as a candidate for City Council. I saw that residents were increasingly frustrated and concerned about the direction Naples was taking.
Many of us have visited other coastal communities in Florida (and other states) that have become over-built and lost their identity and sense of place. We know that is not yet the case in Naples but we worry what the future holds.
It also is true that some don’t share this concern. In their view, Naples is no longer the small town it was even 30 years ago. Growth and development is inevitable. We should join much of the rest of Florida as a tourist and visitor mecca.
This kind of thinking misses the point....several points really. Certainly Naples has changed in recent decades, but we still have the ability, if we wish, to shape future growth and development to our liking through smart decision-making.. And while tourism and entertainment are important to our economy they must be balanced against the priorities and needs of those who live in our neighborhoods.
This starts with a “residents first” approach to governance. Preserving and protecting the character of Naples means addressing the quality of life issues that impact our town.
Implementing noise ordinances for leaf blowers....enforcing our building codes at construction sites....banning summer use of fertilizers that pollute our waters....and properly monitoring outdoor dining and entertainment at restaurants and bars.
These are just a few examples of quality of life issues that have come before City Council in the last six months – some acted on and some not, at least as yet.
Small town character also is shaped by how we regulate land development and enforce our building codes -- how we control the built environment. For the most part, Naples has a good set of zoning and related ordinances. This is enhanced by an amendment to our city charter 20 years ago that limits height of commercial buildings to 42 feet.
But consistent enforcement of these ordinances has been sorely lacking. Providing deviations and variances has been common practice – virtually every one requested has been approved by our Planning Advisory Board (PAB) and then by City Council over the past five years. This needs to change. (As this article is being written, Council and the PAB have begun to take the first tentative steps to addressing these issues, in the face of increased public scrutiny.)
There is a saying in the business world that culture beats strategy every time. This means that every company or organization has a culture that inevitably leads to decisions of a certain type no matter what its written strategic plan may state.
The same is true with local governments. And the culture of our city government, especially in the last decade, has led to regular approval of development proposals that are inconsistent with our stated vision. One result has been a breakdown in trust between residents and city government. This trust needs to be restored.
When I ran for City Council last year, my goal was to help change that culture. The objective is not to stop development or redevelopment but to make sure its character -- height, density, scale, environmental impact -- is consistent with OUR comprehensive plan, OUR ordinances and OUR vision.
Naples is one of the most desirable locations in the United States. We can set high standards and expect them to be met.
As you read this, Naples is engaged in another city election cycle with three council seats and the mayor’s office being contested on March 17. I strongly encourage all residents to participate in the electoral process – our most important civic duty. And in doing so, inform yourself of the issues being debated in these races, including those discussed in this article. Make your own determination as to which candidates can contribute best to making Naples the town you want it to be.
Old Naples News
New Bike Path Not So Green?
Teresa Heitmann for Mayor - It's time for a real change.
January 15th city council meeting - Agenda item 15.F- Re; Height
Live long and prosper? Naples among top places in U.S. for that, says Parade magazine
Move over, Texas. Florida is now the No. 1 moving destination in America
Brent Batten: City wants to bridge gap between two parks at city-county line
From the verdant trails of the Gordon River Greenway it’s a matter of yards to Freedom Park, with its own nature walk and wetland preserves.
State Court of Appeals rules against Nestle's Ice Mountain bottled water in zoning dispute
Nestle's Ice Mountain bottled water operation in northern Lower Michigan is not an essential public service, its bottled water is not a public water supply, and Osceola Township was within its rights to deny the company zoning approval for a new booster pump station to move its water, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.
Fort Lauderdale needs crisis mentality to solve city’s sewage crisis
By SUN SENTINEL EDITORIAL BOARD SOUTH FLORIDA SUN SENTINEL | JAN 05, 2020 | 6:10 AM
Fort Lauderdale Mayor Dean Trantalis is preparing to reveal a major plan for repairing and rebuilding the city’s crumbling water, sewer and stormwater infrastructure. While needed, the public’s confidence in the city is low. Better oversight is needed. (Joe Cavaretta / South Florida Sun Sentinel)
Fort Lauderdale’s day of reckoning arrives Thursday. It’s long overdue.
At a 6 p.m. City Hall meeting about the city’s infrastructure, Mayor Dean Trantalis told the Sun Sentinel Editorial Board, he will “lay out” a plan to repair and rebuild Fort Lauderdale’s water, sewer and stormwater systems. Trantalis spoke last Tuesday, as the city was dealing with another sewer pipe rupture.
Trantalis declined to provide details. But he said the plan, which has been in the works since October, would address “all short- and long-term issues” related to the city’s plumbing. Referring to the American-led effort to rebuild Germany after World War II, Trantalis called it “a Marshall Plan for Fort Lauderdale.”
Though the comparison might be a stretch, the urgency is not. Events of the last three weeks have exposed — yet again —
decades of neglect and denial regarding Fort Lauderdale’s most basic and vital services. Trantalis said, “We have been hiding our heads in the sand.”
The cost of the neglect will be huge. One consultant has estimated that Fort Lauderdale will have to spend $1.4 billion. Trantalis cautioned, however, “We won’t know for sure until we start digging.”
Residents will be shocked to learn that the $200 million the city borrowed in January 2018 for sewer costs won’t go toward this “Marshall Plan.” Trantalis said that money — which the city is repaying by charging higher utility fees — is for “previous rehab work” tied to a settlement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
Between 2014 and 2017, Fort Lauderdale allowed sewage discharges into state waters. One discharge, in mid-2016, was 10.6 million gallons.
“We were trucking sewage for weeks,” Trantalis said. The cost of that alone was $20 million. “This is crazy.”
Crazy indeed, but hardly surprising.
For years, Fort Lauderdale has allowed decrepit plumbing to foul canals in the self-proclaimed “Venice of America.” Pollution in Las Olas Isles has been several hundred times higher than levels considered safe. Last summer, a water main break caused by a Florida Power & Light contractor cut off drinking water to Fort Lauderdale and the cities it supplies. If workers hadn't plugged the hole with a log, that crisis could have been prolonged.
Previous mayors and city commissions ignored all the warning signs. They approved bigger and bigger developments that further stressed the system. For a decade, they raided the water and sewer fund — which runs on fees and assessments — to balance the city’s operating budget, which uses property taxes to pay for such services as police, fire and parks. The raids siphoned $20 million a year from the fund as the problem worsened.
The current commission, elected in March 2018 amid promises to deal with the water and sewer crisis, didn’t act decisively. Commissioners only limited the raid to $15 million for the current budget. Trantalis said the city “could have not have absorbed the impact” of cutting that amount in services and payroll.
So why not raise the property tax rate, which is much lower than that of other older, full-service cities in South Florida? Trantalis said residents and businesses already faced higher bills because of rising property values.
Yet Trantalis and city commissioners managed to more than double their salaries this year — to $78,840 and $65,700 —
and give themselves city-financed health insurance. The mayor and commissioners also will get automatic annual raises.
The bill for all that short-term thinking, however, is coming.
“There will be an increased cost of living and doing business in Fort Lauderdale,” the mayor said. To address the crisis piecemeal would “beg future problems.” That’s also an understatement.
Trantalis noted, correctly, that there’s been a cost to the city beyond the money for pipes and emergency work. The environment has suffered, and not just within Fort Lauderdale.
All the sewage the city pumped out of Rio Vista won’t stay in the Tarpon River. It will move from there into the New River and from there into the Intracoastal Waterway and from there into the Atlantic Ocean. Now Fort Lauderdale residents understand the outcry from those in Martin County when polluted discharges from Lake Okeechobee foul their waterways.
As in the Treasure Coast, residents want action. Fishing captains – who depend on clean water for their livelihood – will lead a 2 p.m. demonstration Sunday at Tarpon River Brewing. They want to “hold accountable” those who must end this crisis.
That would be Trantalis and the current commission. Their problem is that public confidence in the city is low. How low? The sewer breaks in Coral Ridge were somehow considered less of an emergency because the pipes were only 12 inches and 16 inches, compared to the 54-inch break in Rio Vista. The city doesn’t even have a permanent public works director.
Fort Lauderdale could create an oversight committee to monitor the plumbing plan, but that’s no guarantee. The Broward County Commission is poised to big foot a similar oversight committee charged with monitoring spending from the 2018 transportation tax surcharge. As structured, committee members say the promise of independence has been broken.
Fortunately, Miami-Dade County offers a warning.
After years of similarly irresponsible failures to maintain its sewer system, the county faced lawsuits by the state and federal governments for violating the Clean Water Act. The settlement required Miami-Dade to spend $1.6 billion over 15 years to eliminate sewage spills. A judge ensured the outcome got it right. Because of those lawsuits, spills are way down.
If the threat of litigation isn’t enough incentive — the state has continued to fine the city; Gov. Ron DeSantis wants to increase environmental fines — Fort Lauderdale also could face higher borrowing costs. Ratings agencies could determine that the city’s resiliency plan is inadequate.
Trantalis said current prospects for state or federal help are low. When he meets with other mayors on this subject, the conclusion is, “We must rely on our own resources.”
Eventually, though, the Legislature must get involved on the issue of resiliency. Sales taxes from South Florida fuel the state’s general fund. Florida will suffer if rising seas and ancient plumbing threaten the regional economy.
At the very least, Tallahassee should attempt to understand the scope of the problem. Rep. Kristin Jacobs, D-Coconut Creek, and Sen. Ben Albritton, R-Bartow, have introduced legislation that would require the DEP to take an inventory of the state’s water resources and infrastructure. It has not had a committee hearing in either chamber.
But the city could help in ways that don’t involve money. Commissioners should discuss a pause on development approvals. Though Trantalis opposes a moratorium because he wants to keep pushing affordable housing, the idea likely would have public support.
In 2016, a petition drive got enough signatures to force a referendum on a one-year moratorium east of U.S. 1. At that time, the issue was traffic. The commission at the time used a technicality to head off the push.
Fort Lauderdale touts its All-America City Award, but that recognition means nothing when sewage is running in the streets and residents wonder if their neighborhood is next.
Commissioner Steve Glassman pointed out that the sewer spill pipe in Victoria Park was the fourth since 2014. The pipe itself dates to 1973.
Fort Lauderdale soon will open a new City Hall near the Brightline station, as part of a complex with a new county government center. That project symbolizes the city’s misplaced priorities. On Thursday, those priorities must start changing dramatically.
Editorials are the opinion of the Sun Sentinel Editorial Board and written by one of its members or a designee. The Editorial Board consists of Editorial Page Editor Rosemary O’Hara, Sergio Bustos, Steve Bousquet and Editor-in-Chief Julie Anderson.