Fort Lauderdale needs crisis mentality to solve city’s sewage crisis

By SUN SENTINEL EDITORIAL BOARD SOUTH FLORIDA SUN SENTINEL | JAN 05, 2020 | 6:10 AM

Fort Lauderdale Mayor Dean Trantalis is preparing to reveal a major plan for repairing and rebuilding the city’s crumbling water, sewer and stormwater infrastructure. While needed, the public’s confidence in the city is low. Better oversight is needed. (Joe Cavaretta / South Florida Sun Sentinel)

Fort Lauderdale’s day of reckoning arrives Thursday. It’s long overdue.

At a 6 p.m. City Hall meeting about the city’s infrastructure, Mayor Dean Trantalis told the Sun Sentinel Editorial Board, he will “lay out” a plan to repair and rebuild Fort Lauderdale’s water, sewer and stormwater systems. Trantalis spoke last Tuesday, as the city was dealing with another sewer pipe rupture.

Trantalis declined to provide details. But he said the plan, which has been in the works since October, would address “all short- and long-term issues” related to the city’s plumbing. Referring to the American-led effort to rebuild Germany after World War II, Trantalis called it “a Marshall Plan for Fort Lauderdale.”

Though the comparison might be a stretch, the urgency is not. Events of the last three weeks have exposed — yet again —

decades of neglect and denial regarding Fort Lauderdale’s most basic and vital services. Trantalis said, “We have been hiding our heads in the sand.”

The cost of the neglect will be huge. One consultant has estimated that Fort Lauderdale will have to spend $1.4 billion. Trantalis cautioned, however, “We won’t know for sure until we start digging.”

Residents will be shocked to learn that the $200 million the city borrowed in January 2018 for sewer costs won’t go toward this “Marshall Plan.” Trantalis said that money — which the city is repaying by charging higher utility fees — is for “previous rehab work” tied to a settlement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

Between 2014 and 2017, Fort Lauderdale allowed sewage discharges into state waters. One discharge, in mid-2016, was 10.6 million gallons.

“We were trucking sewage for weeks,” Trantalis said. The cost of that alone was $20 million. “This is crazy.”

Crazy indeed, but hardly surprising.

For years, Fort Lauderdale has allowed decrepit plumbing to foul canals in the self-proclaimed “Venice of America.” Pollution in Las Olas Isles has been several hundred times higher than levels considered safe. Last summer, a water main break caused by a Florida Power & Light contractor cut off drinking water to Fort Lauderdale and the cities it supplies. If workers hadn't plugged the hole with a log, that crisis could have been prolonged.

Previous mayors and city commissions ignored all the warning signs. They approved bigger and bigger developments that further stressed the system. For a decade, they raided the water and sewer fund — which runs on fees and assessments — to balance the city’s operating budget, which uses property taxes to pay for such services as police, fire and parks. The raids siphoned $20 million a year from the fund as the problem worsened.

The current commission, elected in March 2018 amid promises to deal with the water and sewer crisis, didn’t act decisively. Commissioners only limited the raid to $15 million for the current budget. Trantalis said the city “could have not have absorbed the impact” of cutting that amount in services and payroll.

So why not raise the property tax rate, which is much lower than that of other older, full-service cities in South Florida? Trantalis said residents and businesses already faced higher bills because of rising property values.

Yet Trantalis and city commissioners managed to more than double their salaries this year — to $78,840 and $65,700 —

and give themselves city-financed health insurance. The mayor and commissioners also will get automatic annual raises.

The bill for all that short-term thinking, however, is coming.

“There will be an increased cost of living and doing business in Fort Lauderdale,” the mayor said. To address the crisis piecemeal would “beg future problems.” That’s also an understatement.

Trantalis noted, correctly, that there’s been a cost to the city beyond the money for pipes and emergency work. The environment has suffered, and not just within Fort Lauderdale.

All the sewage the city pumped out of Rio Vista won’t stay in the Tarpon River. It will move from there into the New River and from there into the Intracoastal Waterway and from there into the Atlantic Ocean. Now Fort Lauderdale residents understand the outcry from those in Martin County when polluted discharges from Lake Okeechobee foul their waterways.

As in the Treasure Coast, residents want action. Fishing captains – who depend on clean water for their livelihood – will lead a 2 p.m. demonstration Sunday at Tarpon River Brewing. They want to “hold accountable” those who must end this crisis.

That would be Trantalis and the current commission. Their problem is that public confidence in the city is low. How low? The sewer breaks in Coral Ridge were somehow considered less of an emergency because the pipes were only 12 inches and 16 inches, compared to the 54-inch break in Rio Vista. The city doesn’t even have a permanent public works director.

Fort Lauderdale could create an oversight committee to monitor the plumbing plan, but that’s no guarantee. The Broward County Commission is poised to big foot a similar oversight committee charged with monitoring spending from the 2018 transportation tax surcharge. As structured, committee members say the promise of independence has been broken.

Fortunately, Miami-Dade County offers a warning.

After years of similarly irresponsible failures to maintain its sewer system, the county faced lawsuits by the state and federal governments for violating the Clean Water Act. The settlement required Miami-Dade to spend $1.6 billion over 15 years to eliminate sewage spills. A judge ensured the outcome got it right. Because of those lawsuits, spills are way down.

If the threat of litigation isn’t enough incentive — the state has continued to fine the city; Gov. Ron DeSantis wants to increase environmental fines — Fort Lauderdale also could face higher borrowing costs. Ratings agencies could determine that the city’s resiliency plan is inadequate.

Trantalis said current prospects for state or federal help are low. When he meets with other mayors on this subject, the conclusion is, “We must rely on our own resources.”

Eventually, though, the Legislature must get involved on the issue of resiliency. Sales taxes from South Florida fuel the state’s general fund. Florida will suffer if rising seas and ancient plumbing threaten the regional economy.

At the very least, Tallahassee should attempt to understand the scope of the problem. Rep. Kristin Jacobs, D-Coconut Creek, and Sen. Ben Albritton, R-Bartow, have introduced legislation that would require the DEP to take an inventory of the state’s water resources and infrastructure. It has not had a committee hearing in either chamber.

But the city could help in ways that don’t involve money. Commissioners should discuss a pause on development approvals. Though Trantalis opposes a moratorium because he wants to keep pushing affordable housing, the idea likely would have public support.

In 2016, a petition drive got enough signatures to force a referendum on a one-year moratorium east of U.S. 1. At that time, the issue was traffic. The commission at the time used a technicality to head off the push.

Fort Lauderdale touts its All-America City Award, but that recognition means nothing when sewage is running in the streets and residents wonder if their neighborhood is next.

Commissioner Steve Glassman pointed out that the sewer spill pipe in Victoria Park was the fourth since 2014. The pipe itself dates to 1973.

Fort Lauderdale soon will open a new City Hall near the Brightline station, as part of a complex with a new county government center. That project symbolizes the city’s misplaced priorities. On Thursday, those priorities must start changing dramatically.

Editorials are the opinion of the Sun Sentinel Editorial Board and written by one of its members or a designee. The Editorial Board consists of Editorial Page Editor Rosemary O’Hara, Sergio Bustos, Steve Bousquet and Editor-in-Chief Julie Anderson.

Naples City Council unanimously approves new resort to replace Naples Beach Hotel

Laura Layden, Naples Daily NewsPublished 7:29 p.m. ET Nov. 20, 2019

Naples-based developer Stock Development has revised its plans for a mixed-used project dubbed One Naples.Laura Layden

Naples City Council has approved plans for a new five-star resort that will take the place of the historic Naples Beach Hotel.

The developer has said the plans are designed to continue the traditions that have made the storied hotel an important part of the fabric of the community, but the project has drawn mixed reaction in the community.

With two unanimous votes of 7-0 Wednesday, the City Council approved a site plan with deviations — or exceptions — from city codes and a developer rights agreement setting the standards for redevelopment of the hotel.

The decisions came after a day-long hearing, during which all aspects of the multi-million-dollar project were presented and considered in great detail.

The Athens Group plans to raze the beach hotel and build a smaller luxury resort, with "best-in-class" residential condos along both sides of Gulf Shore Boulevard North.

The Athens Group President Kim Richards issued a statement thanking the community for its support.

"Undertaking this project is a responsibility we take joyfully yet seriously, not only for the City of Naples, but also for the Watkins family and the legacy of hospitality they have forged in this community," the statement reads. "It is an honor to follow in their footsteps, and we look forward to stewarding the next generation of the Naples Beach Hotel.”

In a separate but related vote, the City Council also gave a unanimous thumbs up to the revised development plan for the condos after getting some minor concessions from The Athens Group. A second hearing will be required to finalize the vote on this part of the project.

At the second hearing, slated for Dec. 4., council members will once again vote on the changes to the development plan for the residences — as well as the proposed site plan that goes with it.

At Wednesday's meeting, the City Council had a first look at the hotel's design, which generated a host of questions, including why the developer needed a cupola on top of it that would exceed the city's allowable height limits.

Tim McCarthy, architect for Hart Howerton, explained the importance of the cupola, saying it represented an opportunity to "define hospitality in the future," and a way to "extend the Watkins legacy." The alternative, he said, would be a design that would simply not have the same panache. 

The Watkins family has owned the 125-acre beachfront resort property for more than 70 years and has worked closely with the developer to ensure that it remains as accessible to the public as possible. 

The public hearing opened with comments from Henry B. Watkins III, an owner of the hotel and property, who urged the City Council to support the redevelopment project as envisioned by the developer — and to make the "right decision," describing it as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

"We are proud to have been a leader in shaping what Naples has become today," he said. "We believe our vision as a family contributed to today's visions of what Naples' future can be. We chose The Athens Group because we believe they were best suited to carry on this legacy."

He reminded the City Council what his family has done for the community and the importance of continuing its traditions, which the developer has vowed to do by maintaining the golf course and keeping it open to the public.

The project, Watkins said, is in the best interest of "all citizens of Naples," once again providing Naples with a gift of green space, beach access, sunsets and hospitality.

"Remember once in a lifetime only happens once," he said before the start of the developer's formal presentation. 

During the council's discussion, many of the early concerns and questions raised centered around traffic and parking.

Some council members questioned whether a detailed parking plan presented by the developer's team of experts would accommodate the expected increase in the number of employees needed to run the more upscale luxury resort. 

While it will have about 100 fewer rooms, the new resort will have about 440 employees to meet the higher expectations of its higher end market. That compares to fewer than 290 required to service the current hotel.

Based on his own calculations, Councilman Gary Price said he feared that parking on the busiest days might not be enough to fit all of its employees on a peak day in peak season.

"I don't know if the calculations are appropriate, given what's going to be there," he said.

Jeff Perry, senior transportation planner and project manager with Stantec, said that even on the busiest days, all of the employees would not be onsite — and not all of them would require parking spots, as many of them would likely be dropped off, or use bicycles or public transportation to get to work.

Councilman Terry Hutchison asked about the accuracy of the predictions for parking demand — and how the hotel might handle a visit from "the head of state."

Perry quipped that it "depends on what head of state," bringing chuckles from the audience and the council. On a more serious note, he said, the plan requires all hotel guests and visitors to valet park, with no self-parking available for them.

"I've looked at this every which way I can, and believe me, we have the right numbers," Perry said.  

The developer's parking analysis shows the need for 552 spots for the hotel's core operations at 100% occupancy in a worst-case scenario. There will be 598 parking spaces, but a total of 641 vehicles could be accommodated using two motor courts — 89 more than what's expected to be needed on the busiest of days. 

Naples-based developer Stock Development has revised its plans for a mixed-used project dubbed One Naples. Laura Layden, Wochit

Additionally, there are remedies built into the parking plan if it should fail due to extreme circumstances, including allowing overflow parking at the driving range for the golf course. That would provide roughly another 100 spots, if it ever becomes necessary, Perry said.

The developer, he said, has also committed to reduce parking demands by encouraging its employees and guests to use alternative modes of transportation, from ride-sharing services to bicycles.

While parking generated a lot of questions, the City Council asked about everything from how the trash would be handled at the development to how it can ensure that the developer keeps its promises to never build on the golf course.

Of the nearly 20 speakers who stood up to voice their opinions about the project, most  supported it and applauded the developer's tremendous outreach efforts to the community.

The Athens Group has held more than 70 meetings with neighbors and community groups to answer questions and get feedback about what promises to be one of the biggest redevelopment projects Naples has ever seen. 

Naples resident Barry Fitzpatrick described the developer's plans as "rock solid," saying he's confident The Athens Group will deliver what it's promised.

"World class is such an overused word I hesitate to use it," he said. "But if there is such a thing, this is it."  

Joe Basili, who lives near the hotel, isn't as enamored with what the developer has proposed. He doesn't like that The Athens Group has asked for multiple variances and deviations from the city's code.

"I'm all for healthy development," he said. "That's what's made Naples great." 

The city has a really good comprehensive plan to guide development and there's good reason to follow it, Basili said.

One of his biggest concerns is parking, he said, which he believes won't be sufficient, especially in the busy tourist season.

He urged the City Council to vote no to force more compromises from the developer.

"There is a lot of things being jammed in today," he said, "and that's what concerns me."